Title: Israeli Military Accused of Using White Phosphorus Munitions in Lebanon and Gaza
Introduction (Word Count: 45)
Human Rights Watch (HRW) has accused the Israeli military of employing white phosphorus munitions in Lebanon and Gaza, igniting international concerns over the use of this toxic substance. HRW claims to have verified the use of white phosphorus through interviews and videos showcasing its firing on two different locations.
Body (Word Count: 310)
White phosphorus, known for its ability to burn at extremely high temperatures and melt metal, is often utilized by military forces to create smokescreens and generate thick smoke over wide areas. HRW’s investigation reveals that the substance was deployed through various means, including artillery shells, bombs, rockets, and grenades.
The dangers associated with white phosphorus are severe. Burns caused by this toxic substance can penetrate deep into the skin and cause dysfunction in multiple organs, such as the liver, kidneys, and heart. The substance continues to burn unless properly washed out, which can lead to lethal consequences if left untreated.
Despite the alarming nature of white phosphorus, it is not currently prohibited by international conventions. Designated as a multipurpose munition rather than an “incendiary weapon,” its use is still deemed acceptable. The United States and Israel contend that their use of white phosphorus is in compliance with international regulations.
This is not the first time Israel has been accused of employing white phosphorus munitions. In 2009, HRW discovered extensive use of such munitions during Operation Cast Lead in Gaza. At first, Israel acknowledged their usage but later denied it. Reports suggest that the Israeli military detonated white phosphorus munitions over populated areas, resulting in civilian casualties and infrastructural damage.
Conclusion (Word Count: 45)
The utilization of white phosphorus munitions by the Israeli military in Lebanon and Gaza has drawn intense scrutiny. HRW’s evidence, including interviews and videos, supports the claim of its usage. The dangers posed by white phosphorus, while not banned by international regulations, raise concerns about its impact on civilian populations and the need for closer examination of its deployment in armed conflicts.
